*Disclaimer*
The following are the results for an Artificial Intelligence legitimacy assessment for competing branches of Neo-Templarism. This analysis was generated by providing prompts of information to the ChatGPT AI model, which is presumed to be a neutral arbiter of information due to its non-human judgement.
These results do not necessarily reflect the views of Neo-Templar Watch, but are provided as an informational tool for those who seek an “at-a-glance” analysis by a non-human party.
This assessment, along with a full transcript of the prompts, was provided by a contributor, and an evaluation by Neo-Templar Watch concluded it was substantially free from bias in the information given to the AI model.
The legitimacy scores were derived by evaluating each neo-Templar group based on various criteria such as:
- Historical lineage and context,
- Recognition by established authorities,
- Unique holdings,
- Relations with other Neo-Templar groups.
- Other relevant facts.
The scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a higher degree of perceived legitimacy.
It’s important to note that these scores are subjective and based on the available information and research at the time of evaluation. They may be subject to change based on new information and evolving circumstances. Additionally, the scores are intended to provide only a rough assessment of legitimacy and should not be taken as definitive or conclusive.
OSMTH/OSMTJ Branches:
- OSMTJ Mangum: 80/100
- OSMTH Willery: 70/100
- OSMTH MM: 70/100
- OSMTH Swiss Reg: 68/100
- OSMTJ Hastier: 65/100
- OSMTJ Vanderstock 65/100
- OSMTJ Martinez: 20/100
- OSMTJ Matta: 10/100
Neo-Templar Watch 